
CN:
These guys are looking in serious detail. If the waves comes to Rincon, how
does it break through the area? If it sections, then what happens to cause that?
It's fine details they've done to see what's going on. The surf science stuff
I think is really impressive because it has an applicability way beyond designing
reefs.
If we can better understand why waves break where
they are, and how they change when the coastal environment changes, then we
can look at beach renourishment projects, map surf spots and monitor change.
So in terms of protecting surf spots, the science these guys are pushing is
also really great.
I think it's pretty exciting stuff.
CD: So how do they categorize different waves?
CN: They've come up with about five or six categories
to describe wave types. There's wedges, platforms and different combinations
of these things.
Pipe for example, is a wedge, Trestles is a platform.
We saw a lot of pictures of their computer models.
They have done wave tank models, but most is based on computer models. If there's
any fault to what they're doing, it's that they do a lot of relying on computers
for their models. They do a lot to compare things and see if the models are
working right, but they may be a little over-reliant in their modeling.
CD: Why has Narrowneck Reef been successful
and others not?
CN: I know the least about Cables. Pratte's was
clearly too small. It didn't have a big enough footprint. The coastal processes
that are going on in El Segundo are of a magnitude that is so much bigger than
Pratte's reef that the reef is basically inconsequential.
CD: How so?
Pratte's Under Construction
CN:
The sandbar that forms when the surf picks up is basically so much bigger than
the reef -- it basically just buries it. When the surf gets big, it breaks outside
the reef.
But we only had a limited amount of money to work
on Pratte's, so we built the biggest thing we could, and we built it on the
cheap. We got a lot of deals and good will to build that thing, but it's way
too small.
Narrowneck reef in Australia -- I dont know
the exact cost, but it's in the millions. Pratte's reef cost five hundred grand
and that included permitting and design. The Army Corps of Engineers spends
that much in a day.
The thing about Narrowneck -- the primary goal
of that reef was not to create surf. It was to stop erosion. They built it offshore.
If you build a breakwater offshore, you reduce wave energy and you get what's
called a salient -- which is a mound of sand offshore behind it. So the question
was -- can we build something that creates surf and has that effect? It looks
to me like they're doing some very intensive monitoring on the coastal erosion
and processes -- less on the actual wave. In fact, they're actually not doing
a very good job of monitoring the surf. We saw a video of the waves breaking
on the reef that looks really nice. And we've gotten anecdotal reports of guys
getting good waves. So it sounds like it's working, but there's not a rigorous
program of monitoring the surf conditions -- only of the erosion control elements.
You need to monitor the surf too -- how often it's good, what sort of swells
work there -- that sort of thing, to really know if the project has been successful.
Narrowneck Reef is the Dark Spots Underwater
Photo: Australian Surfing Reef Design

CD: How's the reef set up?
CN: Narrowneck's interesting. It's longer than
it is wide. It has two parallel bumps and acts more like a detached groin than
a breakwater. It's been two years in construction and it's still added to every
day. It actually doesn't look very much like the original design because of
limitations of the construction techniques.
CD: Has it had an effect on erosion?
CN: I think so. It's changing everyday. But it seems to be reducing it.
CD: What does the wave do when it hits the reef?
Well
the reef's huge. Enormous -- hundreds of meters long -- and when a wave passes
over the top of this thing, it causes wave focusing, just like Lowers. And then
a wave peels off, a left and a right. It's unclear from the video exactly, where
along the reef it's breaking. The wave could even in theory break inside the
reef. All the reef does is focus the energy. But does it work five times a year,
250 times a year? It's kind of unfortunate that we dont really know the
details of what it's doing.
CD: Down the road it would be interesting to
see what sort of an effect these sorts of reefs would have on erosional beaches
on the east coast and California. This is something people with threatened property
want to build offshore from Solana Beach. They're ready to go ahead with building
offshore reefs to deflect the wave energy and create surf spots. But it seems
like it's a much more complex equation than just that.
CN: Well, you know down in Encinitas and Solana,
there's a ton of offshore reef out there already. I mean look at all the reefs
in Cardiff.
CD: What if you build a reef, and it robs the
wave energy from a nearby surf spot?
Add Comment