Shark Attacks Decline

CD: Seems
like journalists like to hype things where sharks are concerned--particularly
with regard to attacks.
GB:
Some of the headlines we saw based on our shark attack information was
predicated by writers who are aware of just that and wanted to push that
angle. And then there are some who wanted to push the other angle, which
was that if there are less sharks, then there are less attacks, and so
that's good.
CD: How
did you feel when you saw the headlines on Time and other magazines
that were declaring 2001 The Summer of the Shark?
GB: Obviously
it was great exaggeration and people bought it. We tried our best to simmer
things down, but we only made little inroads. Then 9-11 happened and put
everything into perspective. I went from 30 press interviews a day and
then that was the last time I talked sharks for weeks.
CD: Well,
let's talk about recent events -- like the attacks in Hawaii and at Avila
Beach, California, and your study of Florida. First off, what causes there
to be so many sharks off the coast of Florida. If you surf in Palm Beach,
or New Smyrna, they're just a fact of life. What are the factors?

Photo: Mark Snyderman, Courtesy Surfline/Swell
GB: Well, Florida clearly has a subtropical to tropical environment.
Those warm waters are attractive to many species of shark. Unlike California
where you've got cool water and very few species of shark, albeit one
very big one. The fact of the matter is that we've got dozens of species
or more that you can encounter in those waters off Florida with great
regularity. Florida is also a very productive fishery area, with lots
of fish. There are going to be predators chasing those fish. You also
have, getting back to our human/shark equation, lots of people entering
Florida waters. They're warm and comfortable. Florida is the fourth most
populous state in the country, and going to the water is a way of life
for Floridians.
On top of
that, you've got an enormous tourist population. So the amount of person-hours
being spent in the water in Florida surpasses any other place in the world.
The coastline, of course is also enormous.
Then you
throw in surfers. We have lots of surfers, and they're going to go to
the best available waves. So that area, in particular, near Ponce Inlet
and New Smyrna Beach, is the most popular site in Florida. The waves are
pretty decent, there is an inlet there, there've been jetties put in that
change the sand flow and improve the inlet. You've got great movement
of water in and out, along with animals that go back and forth. Sharks
love inlets because they're a great place to make a living. You throw
in lots of surfers and that's why we have so many sharks in that area,
and so many reported attacks.

Volusia County: Prime Habitat for Surfers and Sharks
Photo: Dugan/Surfline
CD: That's
as good a definition as I've yet heard. What about Hawaii? Are we looking
at similar tropical factors there?
GB: Well,
you've got similar factors, but you don't have as big a native human population
as you do in Florida. In Hawaii, you also have a more tropical, insular
environment, so you don't see the numbers or varieties of sharks there.
However, in Florida, you don't have concerns about getting hit by the
big three or four -- whites, bulls and tigers are the ones you're most
concerned about in attacks. The sharks people get bitten by in Florida
are usually smaller, non-attacking type species. Black tips, spinners,
black nose and even the little sharp nose sharks that only get to be about
three feet in length. What we get in those situations are lots of cases
of mistaken identity -- tons of people splashing around in low-visibility
water and these sharks make a mistake, they're going after baitfish, but
they misinterpret the splashing of hands and feet. That's why surfers
and boogie boarders are more prone to attack .
CD: Then
in Hawaii, you're talking about big boys.
GB: Right.
There, you don't have as many species in the surf zone. But tigers are
the ones you worry about mostlly. Of course, if one bites you, you've
got a very serious problem. But from that standpoint, attack numbers are
still lower in Hawaii compared to Florida. And in California, there are
also of course, relatively few attacks. But in both cases, because the
species are large -- tigers and whites -- the consequences can be more
severe. We may have 15 times more attacks in Florida, but in Hawaii or
California, you may have that one or two a year that result in serious
injury or death.
CD: We
had that poor woman who got killed at Avila Beach in California by a great
white, and then Bethany Hamilton who lost her arm in Hawaii to a tiger
shark.
GB: Exactly.
CD: In
addition to addressing many surfers in this article, you're also addressing
a lot of surfer fishermen -- especially in Florida. I know that when I
was growing up in South Carolina fishing, there were several times I'd
bring in a little foot long black tip. I'm embarrassed to say it, but
it was a shark, and so there were times I'd just let it flop til it was
dead on the pier. I didn't think that perhaps this shark was contributing
to a healthy ocean ecosystem. What do you say to folks who might not look
at sharks as important?

Photo: NOAA
GB: Well,
surfers are the number one group in my eye, in terms of aquatic recreation
user groups, who have the perspective right. That perspective is that
when we enter the sea, we're entering a wilderness, and we're invaders
to that wilderness. As such, it's incumbent on us to accept the risks
that can occur when you go out there. Surfers as a group know this better
than anyone else. Injuries can occur, people can drown, and equally important,
when you're sitting out there on your board, you're seeing the fish swimming
by you and you realize that you're truly at one with that environment.
As such, surfers in my mind have a very enlightened view. It's a very
rare indeed when I interview a surfer who's been bitten who doesn't say,
'it comes with the territory, I know that risk and will be back next week'.
In the ocean,
you're entering a foreign environment that, as an ecosystem is every bit
as complex and important as the plains of Africa. You wouldn't think about
going to the plains of Africa and not considering that there are lions,
leopards and elephants and rhinos that can do you damage.
CD: In
a way too though, with our guns, we also have dominion over those animals
on the African plain.
GB: Right.
Relative to a shark flopping around on a pier or on a deck, the next step
becomes a no-brainer. There's no reason to kill a shark, a jellyfish or
any kind of fish just to kill it. If we're going to harvest it and eat
it within some level of reason, that's okay. But there's absolutely no
reason to kill something because we don't like the way it looks or it
has the outside possibility of causing us damage somewhere down the line,
anymore than we should be stomping on every bug that crosses our path
on the sidewalk.

Photo: NOAA
CD: Well,
relative to attacks, what will you be studying next?
GB: Well,
there are different possibilities as to why the decline is occurring.
We'll watch it a lot more carefully over the next several years to see
if it continues. If it does, then we might let the headline out that the
decline in sharks worldwide is having the overpowering influence on the
decline in attacks. You can't say that yet, but what you can't deny is
that sharks are in decline worldwide.
www.sharktrust.org
International
Shark Attack File 2003 Shark Attack Summary
|
Environmental Newsletter
|
|
|
No comments have been added to this entry.
Add Comment